You can now set the default archive page to open to by updating going to display in the options menu.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, June 27th, 2007 at 4:42 pm and is filed under Administrative.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
What would be handy is not just a default archive, but a default subset of the archives — or allow the user to describe subsets of the archives that they may wish to peruse.
For instance, it is not hard to imagine a daily reader of the four subjects quant-ph, cond-mat, CS, and math.CO; and even if such a person would never want to get cond-mat listings mixed with their math.CO listings (how gauche would that be!), they may wish to at least peruse quant-ph and cond-math together, and CS and math.CO together, as these subject pairings are more strongly connected and it allows that user to switch between only two “subject clusters”.
Okay, maybe it’s just me. But I’m sure there are a number of people whose regular reading spreads across more than one subject, and don’t especially care to separate the two subjects.
Hmm. Upon closer inspection, including math.CO as a possible subject archive would also be an improvement. (Very small userbase for that subject at the moment, but the question is whether that’s meant to be the case, or meant to be just an accident of SciRate adoption.)
June 17th, 2010 at 12:26 am
What would be handy is not just a default archive, but a default subset of the archives — or allow the user to describe subsets of the archives that they may wish to peruse.
For instance, it is not hard to imagine a daily reader of the four subjects quant-ph, cond-mat, CS, and math.CO; and even if such a person would never want to get cond-mat listings mixed with their math.CO listings (how gauche would that be!), they may wish to at least peruse quant-ph and cond-math together, and CS and math.CO together, as these subject pairings are more strongly connected and it allows that user to switch between only two “subject clusters”.
Okay, maybe it’s just me. But I’m sure there are a number of people whose regular reading spreads across more than one subject, and don’t especially care to separate the two subjects.
June 18th, 2010 at 1:18 am
Hmm. Upon closer inspection, including math.CO as a possible subject archive would also be an improvement. (Very small userbase for that subject at the moment, but the question is whether that’s meant to be the case, or meant to be just an accident of SciRate adoption.)